Frakenstein

In the movie you will need the main parts of the book so that the viewer would understand the main parts. So I believe that this movie is true, but not to the original text. Some parts of this movie have been changed or were been remove. For, example there was no prison in the movie the words that the monsters learn was not the same as the book and the movie, and Elizabeth death was not the same as the book and the movie.Even when there are differences with the book and the movie, the point and story plot is the same. There is a monster and there is a man name Victor.

I believe when you have the main characters it is possible to be very close to the book.Another thing that is not the same is the place that the monster has gone to. In the book the monster has gone to South American, but in the movie the monster had gone to the northward. In the book I feel bad for the monster, but in the movie I feel like the monster was bad and an evil thing.Another thing what doses the writer gain and lose by making these changes? I believe that the writer has gain a lower cost of making the movie. I also believe that he also had lost some things to. He has lost some things from the movie and is not as great as the original.